.
From Pulwama to Pahalgam: India’s script By Muhammad Mohsin Iqbal
INDIA’S history of crafting elaborate narratives to malign Pakistan and justify its aggressive postures has been an ongoing concern for regional stability.
The recent tragic incident in Pahalgam, Kashmir, where tourists came under fire, is yet another episode in a long series of orchestrated events that serve as pretexts for provocations against Pakistan.
Indian media and political leadership wasted no time in launching a disinformation campaign, hastily blaming Pakistan without any credible investigation or evidence.
This false flag operation, thinly veiled as a terrorist attack, is now being used to whip up nationalist sentiment and prepare grounds for a so-called “surgical strike”—a tactic that India has previously employed to distract its public from internal unrest and international embarrassment.
Pakistan has consistently condemned terrorism in all forms and has made monumental sacrifices in its fight against extremism.
Any attempt to link Pakistan to the Pahalgam attack is not only irresponsible but deeply provocative.
It reflects a pattern of behavior where India stages incidents or manipulates events, only to then act as judge, jury and executioner, often at the cost of peace in South Asia.
This is not the first time India has resorted to such theatrics.
One of the earliest and most glaring examples was the infamous Ganga plane hijacking of 1971.
The Indian Airlines flight was reportedly hijacked by two Kashmiri separatists and taken to Lahore.
The hijackers later surrendered to Pakistani authorities, but India promptly used the incident to ban Pakistani overflights, effectively choking off West Pakistan from East Pakistan and strategically aiding its campaign in what became the secession of East Pakistan (now BD).
Years later, Indian intelligence and former officials admitted the possibility of the hijacking being an inside job designed to serve a larger political purpose.
This deceitful episode cast a long shadow on India’s credibility and highlighted its willingness to use civilians and fabricated incidents for strategic gains.
Fast forward to 2016, the so-called “surgical strike” claimed by India following the Uri attack was another attempt to shape a narrative of military prowess and domestic strength.
Despite international skepticism and Pakistan’s denial of any such cross-border incursion, Indian media celebrated it as a great triumph, largely for political mileage.
The lack of evidence, neutral verification or independent reports did not deter the Indian government from exploiting the event for political gain, especially in the context of upcoming elections.
In 2019, the Pulwama attack that killed dozens of Indian paramilitary personnel was once again swiftly blamed on Pakistan.
India responded with an airstrike in Balakot, claiming to have destroyed a terrorist training camp.
However, satellite imagery and ground reports contradicted these claims, showing nothing but a few uprooted trees and a damaged structure.
Pakistan’s swift and measured response, including the capture and subsequent release of an Indian Air Force pilot, Wing Commander Abhinandan, exposed the hollowness of India’s aggression and reinforced Pakistan’s commitment to peace and responsible state behavior.
The timing of the Pahalgam incident and India’s subsequent threats of surgical strikes is telling amid heightened global tensions.
With Israel’s aggression in Gaza and rising civilian casualties drawing global condemnation, India’s anti-Pakistan rhetoric may serve to deflect attention from its allies.
Simultaneously, a high-level U.S. delegation’s visit to India highlights Washington’s strategic Indo-Pacific focus.
However, the U.S. must ensure this partnership doesn’t embolden India’s hostility toward neighbors.
Pakistan, consistently advocating peace and regional cooperation, warns against using manufactured threats to justify aggression.
The geopolitical stakes are high and restraint, not provocation, is vital to regional and global stability.
Adding to this complex scenario is Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s recent visit to Saudi Arabia, where economic and strategic partnerships were emphasized.
While strengthening bilateral ties is every nation’s right, using such engagements as diplomatic leverage to isolate Pakistan or justify hostile intent would be a dangerous miscalculation.
The international community must view India’s latest allegations and the threat of a surgical strike with critical scrutiny.
Such actions risk not only bilateral escalation but also broader regional instability.
False flag operations and unverified claims only serve to inflame tensions and erode trust.
It is essential for global powers and multilateral institutions to urge restraint, demand independent investigations and hold accountable those who deliberately fan the flames of conflict.
Peace between two nuclear-armed neighbors cannot be held hostage to propaganda, fake narratives and political opportunism.
The region has already suffered from decades of hostility, wars and missed opportunities for cooperation.
Repeating the same dangerous script of deceit and blame games will only further isolate India diplomatically and deepen mistrust.
Pakistan remains firm in its resolve to defend its sovereignty while advocating for peace.
Any aggression based on lies will be met with full diplomatic, moral and, if necessary, military response.
The responsibility lies with India to choose facts over fiction, diplomacy over destruction and peace over propaganda.
The world is watching—and history, as always, will be the ultimate judge.
—The writer is contributing columnist, based in Islamabad. (ememiqbal68@gmail.com)
Source: https://pakobserver.net/from-pulwama-to ... as-script/
From Pulwama to Pahalgam: India’s script By Muhammad Mohsin Iqbal
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2025 2:09 am
- Has thanked: 2 times
Return to “Current Affairs Articles”
Jump to
- Rules & Regulations
- ↳ Forum Rules
- CSS Syllabus
- ↳ Compulsory Subjects Syllabus
- ↳ Essay (100 Marks)
- ↳ English (Precis & Composition) (100 Marks)
- ↳ General Science & Ability (100 Marks)
- ↳ Current Affairs (100 Marks)
- ↳ Pakistan Affairs (100 Marks)
- ↳ Islamiat (100 Marks)
- ↳ Optional Subjects Syllabus
- ↳ Group I
- ↳ Accountancy & Auditing (200 Marks)
- CSS Past Papers
- Editorials
- ↳ Editorials
- ↳ DAWN Editorials
- ↳ Express Tribune Editorials
- ↳ Daily Times
- CSS Compulsory Subjects
- ↳ Essay
- ↳ English Precis & Composition
- ↳ English Precis & Composition Books
- ↳ Current Affairs
- ↳ Current Affairs Articles
- ↳ Pakistan Affairs
- ↳ General Science and Ability
- ↳ Islamic Studies
- CSS Optional Subjects - Group I
- ↳ Accountancy & Auditing
- ↳ Economics
- ↳ Computer Science
- ↳ Political Science
- ↳ International Relations
- CSS Optional Subjects - Group II
- ↳ Physics
- ↳ Chemistry
- ↳ Applied Mathematics
- ↳ Pure Mathematics
- ↳ Statistics
- ↳ Geology
- CSS Optional Subjects - Group III
- ↳ Business Administration
- ↳ Public Administration
- ↳ Governance & Public Policies
- ↳ Governance & Public Policies
- ↳ Town Planning & Urban-Management
- CSS Optional Subjects - Group IV
- ↳ History of Pakistan & India
- ↳ Islamic History & Culture
- ↳ British History
- ↳ European History
- ↳ European History
- CSS Optional Subjects - Group V
- ↳ Gender Studies
- ↳ Environmental Sciences
- ↳ Agriculture & Forestry
- ↳ Botany
- ↳ Zoology
- ↳ English Literature
- ↳ Urdu Literature
- CSS Optional Subjects - Group VI
- ↳ Law
- ↳ Constitutional Law
- ↳ International Law
- ↳ Muslim Law & Jurisprudence
- ↳ Mercantile Law
- ↳ Criminology
- ↳ Philosophy
- CSS Optional Subjects - Group VII
- ↳ Journalism & Mass Communication
- ↳ Psychology
- ↳ Geography
- ↳ Sociology
- ↳ Anthropology
- ↳ Punjabi
- ↳ Sindhi
- ↳ Pushto
- ↳ Balochi
- ↳ Persian
- ↳ Arabic
- Book Reviews
- ↳ CSS PMS Book Reviews