False Narrative of Recognition: Pakistan’s Firm Policy on Israel
In recent weeks, a flurry of claims has circulated suggesting that Pakistan is preparing to recognize Israel. These allegations, however, are baseless propaganda designed to create confusion, sow division, and weaken Pakistan’s national unity. For decades, Pakistan’s stance on Israel has remained clear, principled, and unwavering: recognition of Israel will only be considered after the establishment of an independent Palestinian state on pre-1967 borders, with Al-Quds Al-Sharif (Jerusalem) as its rightful capital.
Introduction: The Latest Propaganda and Its Motives
False narratives are not new in geopolitics. They often arise at critical junctures, aiming to distort public perception and manipulate political discourse. The recent rumors about Pakistan shifting its stance toward Israel fall squarely into this category. By spreading misinformation, hostile actors seek to weaken Pakistan’s credibility in the Muslim world and undermine its long-standing support for the Palestinian cause.
Pakistan’s Clear and Consistent Policy on Israel
The Pre-1967 Borders and Al-Quds Al-Sharif
Since its inception, Pakistan has aligned itself firmly with the Palestinian struggle for independence. Islamabad’s policy rests on a simple principle: no recognition of Israel until Palestinians are free. This includes the restoration of lands occupied after the 1967 war and the recognition of Al-Quds Al-Sharif as the capital of Palestine.
Deputy Prime Minister Ishaq Dar’s Reaffirmation
Recently, Deputy Prime Minister Ishaq Dar reiterated this position in unequivocal terms, silencing speculation about any secret deal or policy shift. His statement reaffirmed Pakistan’s role as a staunch ally of the Palestinian people, committed to justice and international law.
Engagement Does Not Mean Recognition
The 21-Point Peace Framework from Washington
Pakistan’s endorsement of the 21-point peace framework proposed in Washington is being misinterpreted by critics. Participation in these discussions signals engagement in global diplomacy, not recognition of Israel. The framework, supported by multiple Muslim-majority nations, seeks to address the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Gaza and push for a sustainable resolution to the conflict.
Constructive Diplomacy vs Misleading Narratives
Engagement in diplomatic initiatives is fundamentally different from abandoning national principles. Pakistan is leveraging its position to strengthen the collective Muslim stance, not dilute it. Suggesting otherwise is both misleading and damaging to the broader cause of Palestinian freedom.
Historical Consistency vs Political Hypocrisy
Imran Khan’s Endorsement of the Two-State Solution
Critics often accuse the current government of softening its policy on Israel. However, these claims ignore past actions. For instance, Imran Khan’s government also openly endorsed the two-state solution, a position aligned with international consensus and the stance held by successive Pakistani governments.
Backchannel Contacts and Political Opportunism
Over the years, there have also been reports of backchannel communications between Islamabad and Tel Aviv under different governments. Yet, critics selectively highlight or conceal such incidents depending on their political agendas. This double standard reveals opportunism, not genuine concern for principles.
Pakistan’s Moral Authority in the Muslim World
The Gaza Humanitarian Crisis and Pakistan’s Voice
As Gaza reels from humanitarian catastrophe, Pakistan’s unwavering commitment to the Palestinian cause gives it credibility and moral weight in the Muslim world. By consistently opposing Israeli aggression, Pakistan emerges as a voice of justice and compassion, standing shoulder to shoulder with the oppressed.
Strengthening Muslim Unity Through Diplomacy
Pakistan’s role goes beyond rhetoric. By engaging diplomatically and supporting collective Muslim initiatives, Islamabad strengthens unity within the Islamic bloc. Its voice helps transform compassion for Palestinians into tangible political and diplomatic pressure on Israel.
Why False Narratives Emerge and Their Impact
Disinformation as a Tool to Undermine Unity
False claims about Pakistan recognizing Israel serve one clear purpose: to weaken internal unity and erode public trust in state institutions. This disinformation campaign distracts from the real issue—ending Palestinian suffering.
Media Manipulation and Its Geopolitical Agenda
Global and regional actors often exploit media narratives to push geopolitical agendas. By fabricating stories about Pakistan, they aim to divide the Muslim world and reduce Islamabad’s influence as a champion of Palestinian rights.
Conclusion: Staying True to Principles Amid Pressure
Pakistan’s position on Israel remains unchanged and unwavering: no recognition until Palestinians achieve sovereignty on pre-1967 borders with Jerusalem as their capital. Engagement in peace frameworks does not equate to recognition; rather, it reflects Pakistan’s constructive diplomacy to ease suffering in Gaza and advance a just solution.
Amid propaganda and political opportunism, Pakistan continues to uphold its moral responsibility—standing firm with Palestine, uniting the Muslim world, and turning compassion into meaningful diplomatic action.